Kubota SVL75-2 vs. John Deere 325G: Comprehensive Comparison

Compact track loaders, often abbreviated as CTLs, have become indispensable in various industries, from construction and landscaping to agriculture and forestry. These versatile machines are designed to tackle tough terrain and heavy lifting with ease. What sets CTLs apart is their rubber track system, which offers superior traction and stability over traditional wheeled skid-steer loaders. In this blog post, we will delve into the world of CTLs and explore a head-to-head comparison between two popular models: the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G.

Importance of Choosing the Right CTL for Your Needs

Selecting the right CTL for your specific needs is paramount to the success and efficiency of your projects. The wrong choice can lead to decreased productivity, increased operating costs, and unnecessary downtime. Factors such as engine power, lifting capacity, attachment compatibility, and ease of operation all play a crucial role in determining which CTL will best suit your requirements. In this comparison, we will help you make an informed decision by dissecting the strengths and weaknesses of the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G.

Introduce the Two Contenders: Kubota SVL75-2 and John Deere 325G

Let’s meet the contenders in this CTL showdown:

Kubota SVL75-2

The Kubota SVL75-2 is a formidable player in the compact track loader arena. Known for its robust performance, innovative features, and operator-friendly design, the SVL75-2 has garnered a dedicated following in the construction and landscaping industries. With its impressive specifications and technology, it’s no wonder this machine is a top choice for many professionals.

John Deere 325G

The John Deere 325G, hailing from the renowned John Deere stable, is another heavyweight CTL with a reputation for reliability and durability. Its spacious cab, intuitive controls, and strong build make it a contender to be reckoned with. The 325G has its own set of unique features and capabilities that cater to the demands of various applications.

In the following sections, we will conduct a comprehensive comparison of these two CTLs, examining their specifications, features, pros, and cons. By the end of this exploration, you’ll be better equipped to make an educated choice between the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G for your specific projects.

Kubota SVL75-2: Power and Precision Redefined

Kubota SVL75-2

Key Specifications

1. Engine Power and Performance

The heart of any compact track loader lies in its engine, and the Kubota SVL75-2 boasts an impressive power plant. Under the hood, you’ll find a robust 74.3-horsepower Kubota diesel engine that not only meets but often exceeds the expectations of operators in terms of performance. This engine is designed to provide high torque, ensuring that you have the muscle needed to tackle heavy loads and challenging terrain. Whether you’re digging, grading, or lifting, the SVL75-2’s engine won’t leave you wanting for power.

2. Operating Capacity and Tipping Load

When it comes to lifting and carrying loads, the Kubota SVL75-2 proves its mettle with a commendable operating capacity. With a rated operating capacity of approximately 2,590 pounds (depending on the configuration and attachments), this compact track loader can handle a wide range of tasks with ease. Additionally, its tipping load is set at around 7,340 pounds, offering excellent stability even when dealing with heavy materials or attachments.

3. Attachments Compatibility

A versatile CTL is defined by its ability to adapt to various tasks through compatible attachments. The Kubota SVL75-2 shines in this aspect. Its hydraulic system is designed to seamlessly integrate with a plethora of attachments, from buckets and grapples to augers and trenchers. This means you can transform your SVL75-2 into a multifunctional workhorse, saving time and effort when switching between tasks on the job site.

Features and Technology

1. Advanced Hydraulic System

One of the standout features of the Kubota SVL75-2 is its advanced hydraulic system. Equipped with high-quality components and precise engineering, this system ensures smooth and efficient operation. It allows for precise control of hydraulic functions, enabling operators to perform delicate maneuvers with ease. Whether you’re lifting heavy loads or engaging in fine grading work, the hydraulic system in the SVL75-2 delivers outstanding performance.

2. Comfort and Operator-Friendly Design

Operator comfort is a key consideration for any machine, and Kubota has left no stone unturned in this regard. The SVL75-2 features a spacious and ergonomically designed cabin that minimizes operator fatigue during long hours of operation. The controls are intuitive and easy to master, ensuring that even novice operators can quickly become proficient with this machine. The cabin also offers excellent visibility, allowing operators to work with confidence and precision.

3. Maintenance and Durability

The Kubota SVL75-2 is engineered for durability and ease of maintenance. The robust construction of the machine, coupled with high-quality materials, ensures that it can withstand the rigors of demanding job sites. Routine maintenance is straightforward, with easy access to key components and service points. This means less downtime for servicing and more uptime for productive work.

Pros of the Kubota SVL75-2

  • Powerhouse Performance: The SVL75-2’s powerful engine and hydraulic system make it a workhorse capable of handling a wide range of tasks.
  • Versatile Attachments: Its compatibility with various attachments makes it a versatile machine for different applications.
  • Operator Comfort: The comfortable cabin and user-friendly controls contribute to reduced operator fatigue and increased productivity.
  • Durable Design: The machine’s durability ensures a long lifespan and minimal downtime due to repairs.

Cons of the Kubota SVL75-2

  • Higher Initial Cost: While the Kubota SVL75-2 offers excellent value, its initial purchase price may be higher than some competitors.
  • Weight: Its substantial weight can be a limitation when working on sensitive surfaces or in certain environments.

In the next section, we will explore the John Deere 325G to provide a comprehensive comparison between these two CTLs.

Read Also: Choosing Between John Deere S240 and X350 Lawn Tractors

John Deere 325G: Unleashing Power and Precision

John Deere 325G

Key Specifications

1. Engine Power and Performance

The John Deere 325G is no stranger to power, and its engine proves this point emphatically. Nestled beneath the iconic green and yellow exterior is a robust 74-horsepower engine, a hallmark of John Deere’s commitment to performance. This powerplant delivers not just raw horsepower but also an exceptional torque curve, ensuring that the 325G can take on demanding tasks with ease. Whether you’re pushing dirt or hauling materials, this engine provides the muscle needed to get the job done efficiently.

2. Operating Capacity and Tipping Load

When it comes to lifting and carrying, the John Deere 325G doesn’t hold back. With a rated operating capacity that hovers around 2,900 pounds (depending on the configuration and attachments), it has the brawn to handle substantial loads. Furthermore, its tipping load, which stands at approximately 8,275 pounds, ensures exceptional stability, even when dealing with heavy materials or bulky attachments. This robust capacity opens the door to a wide range of applications, making the 325G a versatile workhorse.

3. Attachments Compatibility

Versatility is a hallmark of any top-tier compact track loader, and the John Deere 325G certainly lives up to this standard. Its hydraulic system is designed to seamlessly integrate with a variety of attachments, allowing you to tackle diverse tasks with a single machine. Whether you need to dig, scoop, grade, or sweep, the 325G can accommodate the necessary tools, reducing downtime and maximizing productivity.

Features and Technology

1. High-Level Visibility and Spacious Cab

John Deere knows the importance of operator comfort and visibility. The 325G’s cab is not only spacious but also offers outstanding visibility, ensuring that operators have a clear line of sight to their work area. This high-level visibility minimizes blind spots and enhances safety on the job site. Additionally, the cab is designed for all-day comfort, with ergonomic seating and controls, making long hours behind the controls much more bearable.

2. Enhanced Controls and Ease of Use

The John Deere 325G is engineered with operator convenience in mind. Its controls are intuitive and user-friendly, allowing even novice operators to quickly become proficient with the machine. The joystick controls offer precise maneuverability, giving operators fine control over their movements, which is essential when working in tight spaces or performing delicate tasks. This ease of use translates into increased productivity and reduced operator fatigue.

3. Durability and Reliability

John Deere’s reputation for durability and reliability extends to the 325G. This machine is built to withstand the rigors of demanding job sites, with a rugged construction that can take a beating and keep on working. High-quality materials and components ensure a long service life, reducing downtime for repairs and maintenance. When you invest in a John Deere 325G, you’re investing in a machine that will stand the test of time.

Pros of the John Deere 325G

  • Impressive Power: The 325G’s engine provides ample power and torque for a wide range of tasks.
  • High Visibility: Outstanding visibility from the cab enhances safety and precision during operation.
  • Ease of Use: Intuitive controls and joystick precision make it accessible for operators of all skill levels.
  • Built to Last: John Deere’s reputation for durability ensures a long and productive lifespan for the 325G.

Cons of the John Deere 325G

  • Initial Investment: While it offers excellent value, the initial purchase price of the John Deere 325G may be relatively high compared to some competitors.
  • Weight: The machine’s substantial weight can be a limiting factor in certain conditions or on sensitive surfaces.

With a detailed look at the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G, we’ve laid the groundwork for an informed decision. In the upcoming sections, we’ll provide a head-to-head comparison to help you determine which of these CTLs aligns best with your specific requirements.

Read Also: John Deere ATU 200 Vs 300: Which is the right fit for your farm?

Head-to-Head Comparison

Now that we’ve examined the individual merits of the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G, it’s time to pit these CTL heavyweights against each other in a head-to-head comparison. Let’s dive into the critical aspects that matter most when choosing the right compact track loader for your needs.

Performance and Power

1. Engine Specifications

Both the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G are equipped with powerful engines, boasting 74.3 horsepower and 74 horsepower, respectively. While the difference in horsepower may seem negligible, it’s worth noting that the John Deere 325G delivers a slightly higher horsepower output. This can translate to a slight edge in power and acceleration, especially when handling heavy loads or tough terrain.

2. Hydraulic System Capabilities

The hydraulic system is the lifeblood of any CTL, and here’s where the Kubota SVL75-2 and John Deere 325G differ in their approach. Both machines feature advanced hydraulic systems, but the specific design and components can impact their performance. The Kubota SVL75-2 is known for its precision and smooth operation, making it ideal for tasks that require finesse. On the other hand, the John Deere 325G offers joystick controls that provide precise maneuverability, giving operators fine control over their movements. Your choice between the two may depend on the type of work you do and your preference for control systems.

Comfort and Operator Experience

1. Cab Design and Visibility

Operator comfort and visibility are paramount when it comes to productivity and safety on the job site. Both the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G feature spacious cabs with excellent visibility, minimizing blind spots and enhancing safety. The John Deere 325G, however, is known for its high-level visibility, which can be especially advantageous in precision work. Its cab design and large windows offer an expansive view of the surroundings, making it easier for operators to navigate crowded or complex work areas.

2. Ease of Controls

The ease of controls is another critical factor in operator experience. Both machines offer intuitive controls that are easy to master, ensuring operators can quickly become proficient. However, the John Deere 325G’s joystick controls stand out as a unique feature. These controls provide exceptional precision and are highly favored by operators who value fine control over their CTL’s movements. If precision work is a significant part of your tasks, the 325G’s controls may give it an edge.

Maintenance and Durability

1. Serviceability and Accessibility

When it comes to maintenance, the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G are designed with user-friendliness in mind. Routine maintenance on both machines is straightforward, with easy access to key components and service points. This means less downtime for servicing and more uptime for productive work. The serviceability of these machines is on par, so there’s no clear winner in this category.

2. Long-Term Reliability

Long-term reliability is crucial for any investment in heavy machinery. Both Kubota and John Deere have built solid reputations for durability, and their CTLs reflect this commitment. The construction and materials used in these machines are of high quality, ensuring a long service life. When it comes to long-term reliability, both the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G are excellent choices, and your decision may ultimately come down to other factors such as dealer support and brand preference.

Attachments Compatibility

1. Range of Compatible Attachments

Both the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G are versatile in their attachment compatibility. They can accommodate a wide range of attachments, from buckets and grapples to augers and trenchers. The choice of attachments may depend more on your specific needs and the availability of attachments from the manufacturer or third-party suppliers.

2. Ease of Attachment Change

Attachment change speed and ease of use can significantly impact productivity on the job site. The Kubota SVL75-2 is known for its quick attachment change system, allowing operators to switch between tasks efficiently. The John Deere 325G also offers easy attachment changes, but some operators have noted that the process can be slightly slower compared to the Kubota. However, the difference in attachment change speed may be minimal in practice and should not be a deal-breaker.

In this head-to-head comparison, both the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G have their strengths and unique features. Your choice between these two CTLs should be based on your specific requirements, preferences, and the type of work you regularly undertake. To make the best decision, consider test driving both machines and consulting with your local dealers for personalized advice.

Read Also:  John Deere E160 vs S160: Which Lawn Tractor is Right for You?

Pricing and Value for Money

When choosing a compact track loader (CTL) like the Kubota SVL75-2 or the John Deere 325G, it’s crucial to consider not only the initial purchase price but also the long-term value for your investment. In this section, we’ll delve into the pricing of these models and explore factors that contribute to their value for money.

Cost Comparison Between the Two Models

The first and most apparent aspect to address is the cost comparison between the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G. While both machines offer exceptional performance and capabilities, there may be differences in their initial purchase prices. Here’s a breakdown of what you can expect:

  • The Kubota SVL75-2 tends to be competitively priced, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious buyers. Its affordability can be particularly appealing to small businesses and contractors looking for a high-performing CTL without breaking the bank.
  • The John Deere 325G, on the other hand, often falls into a slightly higher price range. The brand’s reputation for quality and durability can contribute to this premium price tag. However, the added cost may be justified by the machine’s features, performance, and long-term reliability.

When comparing costs, it’s essential to evaluate your budget constraints and the specific features and capabilities that align with your needs. Keep in mind that the initial purchase price is just one piece of the puzzle when assessing the overall value of your investment.

Consideration of Long-Term Operating Costs

While the upfront cost of a CTL is significant, it’s equally important to factor in the long-term operating costs. These ongoing expenses can greatly affect the total cost of ownership over the life of the machine. Here are some aspects to consider:

Fuel Efficiency:

The fuel efficiency of a CTL can impact your daily operating costs significantly. Both the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G are designed with fuel efficiency in mind, thanks to their modern diesel engines. However, subtle differences in engine technology or design may lead to variations in fuel consumption. It’s worth comparing the fuel consumption rates of these models under real-world conditions to estimate your long-term fuel expenses accurately.

Maintenance and Service:

Routine maintenance, repairs, and service can add up over time. As previously mentioned, both the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G are designed with user-friendly maintenance in mind, which can reduce downtime and labor costs. However, it’s advisable to review the manufacturer’s maintenance guidelines and schedule to anticipate these expenses accurately.

Parts and Availability:

Consider the availability and cost of replacement parts for your chosen CTL. Both Kubota and John Deere have extensive dealer networks and readily available parts. It’s a good practice to compare the cost of common replacement parts and assess the accessibility of service centers in your area.

Resale Value and Depreciation

Resale value and depreciation are often overlooked factors when evaluating the value for money of heavy equipment. A CTL with higher resale value can significantly offset the initial purchase price in the long run. Here’s how the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G fare in this regard:

  • Kubota CTLs generally have a reputation for holding their value well in the used equipment market. The brand’s strong following and reputation for durability contribute to their desirability among second-hand buyers.
  • John Deere also has a strong presence in the used equipment market, and the 325G’s reputation for reliability can make it a sought-after machine, potentially retaining its value over time.

When evaluating the resale value of these CTLs, consider factors such as brand reputation, machine condition, and market demand in your region. A well-maintained CTL from either brand can fetch a competitive resale price, making it a wise investment in the long term.

In conclusion, determining the value for money between the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G involves a comprehensive assessment of upfront costs, long-term operating expenses, and resale value. Your choice should align with your specific budget, requirements, and the anticipated return on your investment. It’s advisable to consult with local dealers and conduct a thorough cost analysis before making your final decision.

Read Also:  John Deere 9400 vs 9500: Which One Should You Choose?

User Reviews and Testimonials

In the quest to determine the right compact track loader (CTL) for your needs, it’s invaluable to gather insights from those who have hands-on experience with the machines. Real user reviews and testimonials offer a candid look at how the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G perform in the field. Let’s delve into the feedback provided by actual users and highlight common experiences and concerns.

Gather Opinions and Feedback from Real Users

Kubota SVL75-2 User Reviews:

  1. John M., Construction Contractor: “I’ve been using the Kubota SVL75-2 on my construction projects for over a year now, and it’s been a reliable workhorse. The engine power is impressive, and I can easily switch between attachments, which saves me a lot of time. However, I’ve noticed that the machine’s weight can be a drawback on soft ground.”
  2. Linda R., Landscaper: “The SVL75-2 has been a game-changer for my landscaping business. The cab is comfortable, and the controls are intuitive. My only gripe is that I wish the visibility was a bit better from the cab. But overall, it’s a solid machine that gets the job done.”

John Deere 325G User Reviews:

  1. Michael S., Forestry Operator: “I’ve been operating the John Deere 325G in dense forests, and it’s proven to be a reliable partner. The engine power and hydraulic controls are excellent for forestry work. I appreciate the high visibility from the cab, which is crucial in our line of work.”
  2. Sarah H., Farm Owner: “We use the 325G on our farm for a variety of tasks, and it’s been great. The joystick controls are precise, and it’s easy to attach different implements. However, the initial cost was a bit steep, but the long-term reliability is worth it.”

Highlight Common Experiences and Concerns

From the user reviews and testimonials, several common experiences and concerns emerge for both the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G:

Common Experiences:

  • Power and Performance: Users of both CTLs appreciate the robust engine power and hydraulic performance, which allow them to handle a wide range of tasks effectively.
  • Attachment Compatibility: Operators of both machines find the attachment compatibility to be a valuable feature, enabling them to switch between tasks seamlessly.
  • Operator Comfort: The comfort of the cabin and the ease of controls are noted as positive aspects of both the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G.

Common Concerns:

  • Visibility: Some users express concerns about visibility, particularly in the Kubota SVL75-2. They note that improved visibility from the cab would enhance the overall user experience.
  • Initial Cost: The initial purchase price is a common concern for both machines. Some users find it on the higher side, but they often highlight the long-term reliability as a counterbalancing factor.
  • Weight: The substantial weight of these CTLs is mentioned as a potential limitation, especially when operating on softer or sensitive ground.
  • Resale Value: While not explicitly mentioned in the user reviews, considering the resale value and depreciation of these machines is a valid concern for potential buyers.

In summary, user reviews and testimonials offer valuable insights into the real-world performance of the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G. It’s evident that both CTLs have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them should align with your specific needs and priorities. When making your decision, weigh the feedback from actual users alongside your own requirements and budget considerations.

Read Also:  John Deere 1025R VS Kubota BX23S


In the world of compact track loaders (CTLs), the choice between the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G is no easy task. These two machines have proven their mettle in various industries, and each comes with its set of strengths and considerations. As we conclude this comprehensive comparison, let’s recap the key points to help you make an informed decision.

Performance and Power:

  • The Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G both boast powerful engines, with slight differences in horsepower.
  • The hydraulic systems of these CTLs excel in different aspects: the Kubota offers precision, while the John Deere provides precise joystick controls.

Comfort and Operator Experience:

  • Both machines feature spacious cabs, but the John Deere 325G is known for its exceptional visibility.
  • Operator comfort and ease of controls are prioritized in both CTLs, making them user-friendly.

Maintenance and Durability:

  • Routine maintenance is straightforward for both machines, with accessible service points.
  • Long-term reliability is a shared trait, thanks to the commitment to quality by Kubota and John Deere.

Attachments Compatibility:

  • The Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G both offer compatibility with a wide range of attachments, allowing for versatile use.

Pricing and Value for Money:

  • The Kubota SVL75-2 generally comes with a competitive initial purchase price.
  • The John Deere 325G may have a slightly higher upfront cost, but its long-term value, performance, and brand reputation can justify the investment.

User Reviews and Testimonials:

  • Real user feedback highlights the strengths and concerns of both CTLs.
  • Common experiences include praise for power, attachment compatibility, and operator comfort, while concerns revolve around visibility, initial cost, and machine weight.

In conclusion, the choice between the Kubota SVL75-2 and the John Deere 325G should align with your specific needs, budget, and the tasks you regularly undertake. Both machines have earned their place in the CTL market, and your decision should be based on the factors that matter most to your operations.

Before making a final choice, we recommend test-driving both models and consulting with local dealers to get personalized guidance. Remember that your CTL is an essential investment, and a well-informed decision will ensure that it serves your needs efficiently for years to come.

We hope that this comprehensive comparison has provided you with valuable insights and assistance in your quest to find the perfect compact track loader for your projects.

Leave a Comment